+ Новая дискуссия Люди в теме - 69 Рулевой - mishka1
985

... the two leading OS technologies will be Linux and Windows

,,,,"On ITManagerJournal's question about how Microsoft is going to compete with the 50% Linux sales on new servers, Gates replied that "my numbers are different, depending where you are getting them". He also said that MS has seen many other competitors, including IBM & OS/2, Borland, Apple etc and have survived them all, and he doesn't see something different with this competitor. He did say though that "fast forward 10 years, the two leading OS technologies will be Linux and Windows" hinting that most others (Sun, Mac?) will be eclipsed from the main business scene."...http://www.osnews.com/story.php?news_id=8448Temporara batalie intre Windows si Linux...Go Go Go Linux :-)
0
mishka103 Октября 2004, 13:10
M
mishka103 Октября 2004, 13:10

Fast Forward 10 years - ce optimist Gaytes - el crede ca Microsoft va ruli inca 10 ani

0
  • 0
  • 0
alexander-103 Октября 2004, 15:29
A
alexander-103 Октября 2004, 15:29

As to how Microsoft is going to beat Linux according to Gates, it seems to be via its software's value, rather than the price. Bill Gates is trying to create software that needs little maintainance and little support. By doing so, he hopes to cut down the number of IT administrators needed on companies (a good admin costs overall up to $200,000 per year for a given company here in the Bay Area, for example). On the other hand, Linux rivals (e.g. Red Hat) are making money primarily by support calls and require capable administrators. Gates hopes to elliminate this need.

0
  • 0
  • 0
freejerk03 Октября 2004, 16:00
F
freejerk03 Октября 2004, 16:00
alexander-1...As to how Microsoft is going to beat Linux according...

Da da, Bill Gates considera ca adminii nu trebuiesc :-)

0
  • 0
  • 0
sasha03 Октября 2004, 17:27
sasha03 Октября 2004, 17:27
freejerk...2 Da da, Bill Gates considera ca adminii nu trebuiesc...

в каком-то смысле он прав ;-)

0
  • 0
  • 0
freejerk03 Октября 2004, 17:53
F
freejerk03 Октября 2004, 17:53
sasha...в каком-то смысле он прав ;-)...

Nu-s deacord. O retea fara un admin asta nu-i retea, ca un spital fara doctori. Plus la asta o sa screasca numarul de someri :-)

0
  • 0
  • 0
caliogstro03 Октября 2004, 21:31
C
caliogstro03 Октября 2004, 21:31
freejerk...4 Nu-s deacord. O retea fara un admin asta nu-i retea,...

da, desigur, a crescut numarul de someri cand locul tehnologiilor bazate pe lampi a fost luat de locul tehnologiilor bazate pe tranzistoare. Imi aduc aminte televizoarele cu lampi. Se stricau des, erau multi oameni care le reparau. Cum au aparut televizoarele cu scheme bazate pe semiconductoare situatia s-a schimbat radical. In primul rand in aceste televizoare efectiv nu are ce se strica, lucreaza bine, plus la asta cei ce reparau nu se pricep in ele. In asa mod practic a disparut profesia de "telemaster".

0
  • 0
  • 0
freejerk03 Октября 2004, 21:42
F
freejerk03 Октября 2004, 21:42
caliogstro...da, desigur, a crescut numarul de someri cand locul...

:))) Retelele si televizoarele sunt un pic diferite. Cum ai comparat tu eu pot sa compar si noile tehnologii aparute in medicina, insa asta nu a facut ca doctori sa fie mai putini.

0
  • 0
  • 0
caliogstro04 Октября 2004, 00:56
C
caliogstro04 Октября 2004, 00:56
freejerk...6 :))) Retelele si televizoarele sunt un pic diferite....

asta doar in viziunea contemporana, dar in viitor cine stie... Cine concepea in urma cu vre-o cincizeci de ani ca vor disparea din uz gramofoanele? Si cine concepea cu douazeci de ani in urma ca la calculator vor putea lucra si oameni fara absolut nici un fel de cunostinte in domeniull programarii?

0
  • 0
  • 0
freejerk04 Октября 2004, 01:04
F
freejerk04 Октября 2004, 01:04
caliogstro...asta doar in viziunea contemporana, dar in viitor cine...

E vorba de 10 ani :)

0
  • 0
  • 0
mitiuh05 Октября 2004, 01:51
M
mitiuh05 Октября 2004, 01:51

sper ca asta sa nu se intimple ca raminem toti fara chilotz.
din fericire totusi admini tot timpul o sa fie, cu orice os. macar din considerentul hardware-ului - nimic nu e vesnic. denumirea doar de poate sa fie schimbata.

0
  • 0
  • 0
adrenalin05 Октября 2004, 02:44
A
adrenalin05 Октября 2004, 02:44

/me asteapta frigidere sub SO Windows ;) Eaka cind se va putea de avut bere4free ;o)
Anul 2020.. Ora 11 de noapte.. Se aude cum usa de la frigider se inchide si deschide.. Fetitza cu usuletzul de plush stea si se uita la umbra care venea din bucatarie.. Isi aduce aminte cum anul trecut profesoarea sa de romana a fost inghitzit de catre frigiderul DoSSuit de un bot-net de frigidere hakanite de baitzalu care a fost pus in coltz dupa ce a intirziat la lectii care apoi a fost alungat din clasa..

Hmm.. Nu shi m-o gliucit.. Eaka amu Sun face nu sttiu ce cu open-source.. Cit depsre W$.. Sa vedem ce fel mutant va fi Longhorn..

0
  • 0
  • 0
mitiuh05 Октября 2004, 02:57
M
mitiuh05 Октября 2004, 02:57
adrenalin...W$...

pentru "decriptare" trebuie de intors monitorul cu picioarele in sus si de folosit oglinda? ;)

0
  • 0
  • 0
Administrator@@_13 Января 2005, 03:29
A
Administrator@@_13 Января 2005, 03:29
...,,,,"On ITManagerJournal's question about how Microsoft...

MAN!

0
  • 0
  • 0
caliogstro13 Января 2005, 03:44
C
caliogstro13 Января 2005, 03:44
mitiuh...Adrenalin: "... W$ ..." - pentru "decriptare" trebuie...

:))

...(Sun, Mac?)...

eu cred ca tehnologiile SUN vor fi serios umbrite daca nu vor introduce schimbari radicale in anumite tehnologii, si in special Java. In orice caz eu am observat in Java1.5 tendinte de a impusca cu tunul pentru a nu pierde concurenta. Referitor la Solaris, nu cred ca va fi un OS prea raspandit vre-odata, dar cred ca habitatul lui in lumea sistemelor de operare este stabil si de lunga durata. In privinta Mac, nu prea il cunosc, dar ca user friendly este unul dintre cele mai avansate OS-uri. In general este orientat spre computere Apple care sunt mai scumpe decat PC-urile. Sunt de neinlocuit unde se cere performanta mare la prelucrarea informatiei Multimedia.

0
  • 0
  • 0